🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional review if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence similar discussions in other member states